It’s Monday, and we’re fresh from some great racing at Ironman New Zealand. It was really great to be down watching some racing again (and yes, I did miss racing myself!).
While down at the event, Prof Grant Schofield and I were invited to present on the low carbohydrate healthy fat (LCHF) performance for Ironman.
The link to the presentation can be found in this closed Facebook group here (anyone can join), and we think it was quite well received with 50+ people attending.
However, as always around racing, one of the main questions we always receive is “how do I fuel my races with LCHF?”. Luckily, along with two of my endurance physiology colleagues at AUT, we discussed this very topic in a paper that used theoretical energy fuel requirements of Ironman triathletes at different performance levels (~8 h, ~9 h, and ~13 h).
This paper was published in the Journal of Sports Medicine, and I’ve tried to summarise below. The science is quite heavy so I will split this blog into two parts. This one with the background and the next one with more practical theory.
In the Sports Medicine paper, we tried to determine what the likely carbohydrate and fat requirements would be for Ironman triathletes completing the distance at an elite level (~8 h), at a very high-performing amateur level (~9 h), and at a lower-performing amateur level (~13 h). To do this, we first estimated the overall energy requirement of completing each of the three disciplines, assuming efficiency values typical for the three levels of athlete. As the elite model performance was swimming, cycling, and running faster than the amateurs, the rate of energy expenditure in each discipline was much higher. This is a characteristic feature of better athletes from a metabolic perspective – the ability to sustain higher rates of energy expenditure for long periods.
Next, we identified a low and high estimate for the rate at which each of the three athletes might have been using fat as an energy source, in each of the three disciplines. This varies substantially between different people, so we gave quite large ranges (0.6-1.2 grams per minute for the elite model, 0.5-1.1 grams per minute for the high-performing amateur model, and 0.3-0.9 grams per minute for the low-performing amateur model). Lastly, we used the estimated rate of energy expenditure to calculate the theoretical requirement for the use of carbohydrate as an energy source at both the low and high estimate for fat oxidation.
That’s the complicated part! What was most interesting was that, in all of our models, i.e. low and high rates of fat oxidation and across the performance spectrum, the estimated requirement for energy from carbohydrate sources was higher than what we have stored in our bodies as glycogen (anything from 788-1999 grams depending on the model). This confirms what anyone who has ever finished an Ironman already knew; we need to preserve our limited carbohydrate stores.
In short, what our paper showed, was that for the very elite and top-level age-group athletes, even with very high levels of fat oxidation, it’s almost impossible to complete an Ironman distance race without taking in some form of carbohydrate. I have modelled this below (Figure 1 and 2) and showed at my fat oxidation rate (1.2 g/min, a consistently realistic "maximal" number is ~1.6 g/min). I wouldn’t have made it out of the Energy Lab had I not consumed some carbohydrates (I took 50 g per hour on the bike and 110 g for the entire marathon)
However, at the same time, had my fat oxidation not been high and substantially lower (<0.5 g.min, which is very typical for age-grouper and even pros) I would not have made it to the finish, no matter how much carbohydrate I consumed. Take Figure 3 and 4 below. This athlete who we tested in the lab had maximal fat oxidation of 0.3 g/min (exact same body weight and VO2max as me). Figure 3 shows him hitting the wall in the last 50 km of the bike at 60 g of carbohydrate per hour including the run), and Figure 4 shows him hitting the walls at the start of the marathon with 90 g of carbohydrate per hour. Bottom line is, unless he increases his fat oxidation, he will never make it! Moreover, consuming that much carbohydrate (60 plus grams per hour) can leave you with severe gastrointestinal distress. I have also done a video regarding the perils of very high carbohydrate consumption and fasted blood glucose levels and subsequent health here.
What was unfortunate is that when our paper was published, it seems that this was the main message that was received; "Ironman triathletes at high-performance levels must ingest carbohydrate to meet their energy requirements, or risk bonking". Indeed, the paper showed that some carbohydrates are essential for the top age-grouper and elite athlete. However, throwing more carbohydrate into the mix isn't the answer; increasing your fat oxidation is! For a whole variety of reasons.
In the next blog, I will talk more about why increasing fat oxidation is both sensible and achievable.
Endure IQ's online courses guide athletes and coaches to understand and solve real performance questions in endurance sport.